<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for e.c. myers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ecmyers.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ecmyers.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 06:45:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on alternate wednesday: the time traveler&#8217;s watch by Resdermatrol Review</title>
		<link>http://ecmyers.net/2013/03/time-travelers-watch/#comment-8961</link>
		<dc:creator>Resdermatrol Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 06:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmyers.net/?p=4222#comment-8961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My partner and I stumbled over here  different page and thought I should check things out.
I like what I see so now i&#039;m following you. Look forward to finding out about your web page yet again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My partner and I stumbled over here  different page and thought I should check things out.<br />
I like what I see so now i&#8217;m following you. Look forward to finding out about your web page yet again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on book jackets, milestones, and millstones by comment jouer au poker</title>
		<link>http://ecmyers.net/2012/01/book-jackets-milestones-and-millstones/#comment-8912</link>
		<dc:creator>comment jouer au poker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 01:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmyers.net/?p=1683#comment-8912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am really inspired with your writing talents as smartly as with the structure to your blog.
Is this a paid subject matter or did you customize it 
yourself? Either way stay up the nice quality writing, it is uncommon to peer 
a great blog like this one nowadays..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am really inspired with your writing talents as smartly as with the structure to your blog.<br />
Is this a paid subject matter or did you customize it<br />
yourself? Either way stay up the nice quality writing, it is uncommon to peer<br />
a great blog like this one nowadays..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on book jackets, milestones, and millstones by como jugar al poker</title>
		<link>http://ecmyers.net/2012/01/book-jackets-milestones-and-millstones/#comment-8911</link>
		<dc:creator>como jugar al poker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 01:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmyers.net/?p=1683#comment-8911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice blog right here! Also your web site loads up very fast!
What host are you the usage of? Can I get your associate hyperlink 
to your host? I desire my web site loaded up as fast as yours lol]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice blog right here! Also your web site loads up very fast!<br />
What host are you the usage of? Can I get your associate hyperlink<br />
to your host? I desire my web site loaded up as fast as yours lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on alternate wednesday: Star Trek (2009) by dep1701</title>
		<link>http://ecmyers.net/2013/05/alternate-wednesday-star-trek-2009/#comment-8739</link>
		<dc:creator>dep1701</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 22:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmyers.net/?p=4285#comment-8739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nah, the bridge is still on the very top, which is why J.J. insisted on having a large &#039;window&#039; where the viewer is. He felt the only justifiable reason for having the bridge up that high would be if you had a direct view to the outside.

I think Matt Jeffries, and to a certain extent Gene Roddenberry, were thinking of Earthbound flying craft ( and perhaps Aircraft Carriers ) where having a high vantage point was advantageous... also it looked dramatic, especially when you wanted to swoop the camera down into the top dome ala &quot;The Cage&quot;. They even carried the concept forward into the Next Generation&#039;s 1701-D which also, for no logical reason, had a clear bubble , with space visible, atop the bridge ( the foolishness of which was demonstrated in &quot;Generations&quot; when Riker looks up at the sky through the shattered dome after the saucer crashes... lucky it happened in a breatheable atmosphere, eh? ).

Actually, the most logical place for a vital control center like the bridge would be buried deep in the center of the saucer, where there would be the most layers of protection ( but then J.J. couldn&#039;t have his huge window, and Roddenberry couldn&#039;t have had his dramatic &#039;dome shot&#039; )

Forgive me for getting all Treknical, but I do love the Enterprise and can talk about it for hours. Looking forward to seeing the new film Monday. Have already seen some amazing shots from in a History Channel special titled &quot;Star Trek Secrets Of The Universe&quot;, which combines footage of J.J. Abrams&#039; Trek movies with real world science. It begins and ends with ( what I presume is ) an awesome new shot of the ship from the new movie, starting from an upside-down angle, turning the camera around 180 degrees and closing in on the aforementioned bridge window.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah, the bridge is still on the very top, which is why J.J. insisted on having a large &#8216;window&#8217; where the viewer is. He felt the only justifiable reason for having the bridge up that high would be if you had a direct view to the outside.</p>
<p>I think Matt Jeffries, and to a certain extent Gene Roddenberry, were thinking of Earthbound flying craft ( and perhaps Aircraft Carriers ) where having a high vantage point was advantageous&#8230; also it looked dramatic, especially when you wanted to swoop the camera down into the top dome ala &#8220;The Cage&#8221;. They even carried the concept forward into the Next Generation&#8217;s 1701-D which also, for no logical reason, had a clear bubble , with space visible, atop the bridge ( the foolishness of which was demonstrated in &#8220;Generations&#8221; when Riker looks up at the sky through the shattered dome after the saucer crashes&#8230; lucky it happened in a breatheable atmosphere, eh? ).</p>
<p>Actually, the most logical place for a vital control center like the bridge would be buried deep in the center of the saucer, where there would be the most layers of protection ( but then J.J. couldn&#8217;t have his huge window, and Roddenberry couldn&#8217;t have had his dramatic &#8216;dome shot&#8217; )</p>
<p>Forgive me for getting all Treknical, but I do love the Enterprise and can talk about it for hours. Looking forward to seeing the new film Monday. Have already seen some amazing shots from in a History Channel special titled &#8220;Star Trek Secrets Of The Universe&#8221;, which combines footage of J.J. Abrams&#8217; Trek movies with real world science. It begins and ends with ( what I presume is ) an awesome new shot of the ship from the new movie, starting from an upside-down angle, turning the camera around 180 degrees and closing in on the aforementioned bridge window.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on alternate wednesday: Star Trek (2009) by ecmyers</title>
		<link>http://ecmyers.net/2013/05/alternate-wednesday-star-trek-2009/#comment-8730</link>
		<dc:creator>ecmyers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 20:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmyers.net/?p=4285#comment-8730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I still can&#039;t quite get used to the ship&#039;s fat nacelles, but the rest of it is gorgeous. This time when I saw it, I thought the bridge might be positioned *under* the saucer? Is that right? Hard to say with the way the camera moves around the ship, but that design might make more sense since it would be less exposed there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still can&#8217;t quite get used to the ship&#8217;s fat nacelles, but the rest of it is gorgeous. This time when I saw it, I thought the bridge might be positioned *under* the saucer? Is that right? Hard to say with the way the camera moves around the ship, but that design might make more sense since it would be less exposed there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on alternate wednesday: Star Trek (2009) by dep1701</title>
		<link>http://ecmyers.net/2013/05/alternate-wednesday-star-trek-2009/#comment-8728</link>
		<dc:creator>dep1701</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 19:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmyers.net/?p=4285#comment-8728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m with you.E.C. I went in expecting that Abrams Trek wouldn&#039;t be a slavish recreation of the original Trek and mentally prepared to relax and enjoy the ride ( as I did with Moore&#039;s Battlestar Galactica ). 

Like you, I had some minor quibbles, but otherwise I loved it. It was great to see the characters I grew up loving back in their prime, and ready for new adventures.

I had a bit of trouble getting used to the redesign of the Enterprise ( it first struck me as looking like an Anime version of the ship ), but I&#039;ve gotten used to it enough - and it looks a lot like it&#039;s predecessor in long shots - that I find myself hoping that they don&#039;t blow it to smithereens and start over again in &quot;Into Darkness&quot;...as the trailers would have us believe.

I hope that this version of Trek will &quot;Live Long and Prosper&quot;...at least for a few more good movies!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you.E.C. I went in expecting that Abrams Trek wouldn&#8217;t be a slavish recreation of the original Trek and mentally prepared to relax and enjoy the ride ( as I did with Moore&#8217;s Battlestar Galactica ). </p>
<p>Like you, I had some minor quibbles, but otherwise I loved it. It was great to see the characters I grew up loving back in their prime, and ready for new adventures.</p>
<p>I had a bit of trouble getting used to the redesign of the Enterprise ( it first struck me as looking like an Anime version of the ship ), but I&#8217;ve gotten used to it enough &#8211; and it looks a lot like it&#8217;s predecessor in long shots &#8211; that I find myself hoping that they don&#8217;t blow it to smithereens and start over again in &#8220;Into Darkness&#8221;&#8230;as the trailers would have us believe.</p>
<p>I hope that this version of Trek will &#8220;Live Long and Prosper&#8221;&#8230;at least for a few more good movies!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on upcoming events by ecmyers</title>
		<link>http://ecmyers.net/2013/05/upcoming-events/#comment-8712</link>
		<dc:creator>ecmyers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 00:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmyers.net/?p=4275#comment-8712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Janine! If you can hook me up with some local schools, libraries, or book stores, I&#039;m totally there. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Janine! If you can hook me up with some local schools, libraries, or book stores, I&#8217;m totally there. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on upcoming events by Janine</title>
		<link>http://ecmyers.net/2013/05/upcoming-events/#comment-8650</link>
		<dc:creator>Janine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 15:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmyers.net/?p=4275#comment-8650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m so proud of you, Eugene! You gotta do some Vermont signings so I can cheer you on in person :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so proud of you, Eugene! You gotta do some Vermont signings so I can cheer you on in person :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on win an early copy of Fair Coin! by porn</title>
		<link>http://ecmyers.net/2012/02/win-an-early-copy-of-fair-coin/#comment-8582</link>
		<dc:creator>porn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 23:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmyers.net/?p=1784#comment-8582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A person&#039;s alluring activity accompanied by Porn pics is because a single is 100 % a number of all, if a penny, he holders as.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A person&#8217;s alluring activity accompanied by Porn pics is because a single is 100 % a number of all, if a penny, he holders as.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on a year ago today by jack lalanne power juicer pro</title>
		<link>http://ecmyers.net/2013/03/a-year-ago-today/#comment-7811</link>
		<dc:creator>jack lalanne power juicer pro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 00:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmyers.net/?p=4170#comment-7811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Someone necessarily assist to make severely posts I&#039;d state. This is the first time I frequented your web page and thus far? I surprised with the research you made to create this particular put up extraordinary. Excellent process!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone necessarily assist to make severely posts I&#8217;d state. This is the first time I frequented your web page and thus far? I surprised with the research you made to create this particular put up extraordinary. Excellent process!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
